Alexander Samokhvalov's picture frames : tradition and innovation

In recent years, two contradictory trends related to the study and display of picture frames have emerged in Russian museums. On the one hand, these works have at last caught the attention of scholars leading to publications on the evolution of art framing in Russia. However, the framing of paintings in museums is still not carried out on the basis of conducted research. In the light of a rapidly developing frame market, art historians and art critics have been increasingly replacing historical frames with massproduced ones, while disregarding historical reliability and authenticity of the frames, or the need to follow the author’s conception. Meanwhile, it is known that artists of different eras, as a rule, paid great attention to the selection of picture frames, with some among them, like A. N. Samokhvalov, creating their own. Thus, the purpose of the article is to examine the frames made by Samokhvalov, as well as to draw attention to the question of the author’s original picture framing. Samokhvalov’s frames are characterized by their unique design, which greatly affects the perception of the painting. Despite the fact that there exists a considerable body of art historical studies dedicated to the artist’s work, none of the researchers took notice of the problem of the picture framing. The article is the first to provide a scholarly introduction of designs and drawings of Samokhvalov’s frames, as well as works of art created on their basis. The artist’s frames from the collections of various museums have been attributed according to a comparative analysis. Likewise, traditional and innovative features in the works of Samokhvalov have been revealed as a result of stylistic assessment and comparison of frames produced by the artist with picture frames of the 17th – 20th centuries. The article illuminates the unexplored facet of the artist’s work presenting it in a new light. The research will not only allow to further preserve the unique frames of Samokhvalov in Russian museums, but also exhibit his works in accordance with the author’s intention.

1. 100 let Russkogo muzeya v fotografiyakh. 1898–1998 [= One Hundred Years of the Russian Museum in Photographs. 1898– 1998]. (1998). Palace Editions. [In Rus.]

2. Barsheva, I. & Sazonova, K. (1963). Alexander Nikolaevich Samokhvalov. Khudozhnik RSFSR. [In Rus.]

3. Barsheva, I. & Sazonova, K. (1963). Alexander Nikolaevich Samokhvalov. Exhibition of Works. Khudozhnik RSFSR. [In Rus.]

4. Davydova, O. S. (2015). Ekspansiya obraza. Ramy epokhi moderna [= Expansion of the Image. Frames of the Art Nouveau Era]. In T. L. Karpova (Ed.), Rama kak ob"еkt iskusstva: materialy nauchnoy konferentsii (pp. 169–181). Gosudarstvennaya Tret'yakovskaya galereya. [In Rus.]

5. Itten, J. (2011) Iskusstvo tsveta [= Kunst der Farbe] (L. Monakhova, Trans.). D. Aronov. [In Rus.]

6. Karpova, T. L. (Ed.) (2014). Kartina i rama. Dialogi [= Picture and Frame: Dialogues]. Gosudarstvennaya Tret'yakovskaya galereya. [In Rus.]

7. Kleshchar-Samokhvalova, M. (1996). Ya blagodarna sud'be [= I am Grateful to Fate]. In Aleksandr Samokhvalov. V gody bespokoynogo solntsa. Proza. Stat'i o khudozhnike. Kritika, vospominaniya, pis'ma (pp. 279–286). Vsemirnoе slovo. [In Rus.]

8. Lysenko, O. (2006). Elizaveta Merkur'evna Bеm (1843−1914). Antikvarnoе obozreniе, (4), 26–27. [In Rus.]

9. Lysenko, O. (2019). Ot arkhitektonov K. S. Malevicha – k suprematicheskim ramam N. M. Suеtina [= From the Architectons of K. S. Malevich to the Suprematist Frames of N. M. Suetin]. Panorama iskusstv, (4), 179–199. [In Rus.]

10. Lysenko, O. A. (2005). Istoriya khudozhestvennykh ram v Rossii XIX – nachala XX veka [= The History of Picture Frames in Russia in the 19th – Early 20th Centuries]. In Odet' kartinu. Khudozhestvennyе ramy v Rossii XVIII – nachala XX veka (pp. 21–33). Palace Editions. [In Rus.]

11. Lysenko, O. A. (2015). “Zhivopis'… dolzhna priyti k rame”. K probleme sokhraneniya avtorskogo zamysla K. S. Malevicha [= “Painting... Must Сome to the Frame.” On the Problem of Preserving the Vision of K. S. Malevich]. In Rama kak ob"еkt iskusstva (pp. 199–216). Gosudarstvennaya Tret'yakovskaya galereya. [In Rus.]

12. Lysenko, O. A. (2018). Kartinnaya rama v muzeynoy ekspozitsii: problemy podlinnosti i interpretatsii [= Picture Frame in a Museum Exhibition: Problems of Authenticity and Interpretation]. Muzey – Pamyatnik – Naslediе, 2(4), 103–111. [In Rus.]

13. Lysenko, O. A. (2020). “…Ubedit' ne slovami, a delom v zamechatel'nosti novykh proportsiy” (o suprematicheskikh ramakh N. M. Suеtina) [= “... To Convince Not in Words, but in Deed of Remarkable New Proportions” (on Suprematist Frames of N. M. Suetin)]. In Stranitsy istorii otechestvennogo iskusstva: sbornik statey po materialam nauchnoy konferentsii (pp. 260–270). Gosudarstvennyy Russkiy muzey. [In Rus.]

14. Musakova, O. (2007). K istorii khudozhestvennogo ob"еdineniya “Krug khudozhnikov” [= On the History of the Art Association “Circle of Artists”]. In Ob"еdineniе “Krug khudozhnikov”. 1926–1932 (pp. 5–18). Palace Editions. [In Rus.]

15. Petrov-Vodkin, K. (1982). Khlynovsk. Prostranstvo Evklida. Samarkandiya [= Khlynovsk, Euclid’s Space and Samakrandia]. Iskusstvo. [In Rus.]

16. Samokhvalov, A. (1977). Moy tvorcheskiy put' [= My Creative Path]. Khudozhnik RSFSR. [In Rus.]

17. Samokhvalov, A. (1996). O portrete epokhi [= On the Portrait of the Era]. In Aleksandr Samokhvalov. V gody bespokoynogo solntsa. Proza. Stat'i o khudozhnike. Kritika, vospominaniya, pis'ma (pp. 198–200). Vsemirnoе slovo. [In Rus.]

18. Samokhvalov, A. (1996). Trekhtsvetiе i sfericheskaya perspektiva [= Tricolor and Spherical Perspective]. In Aleksandr Samokhvalov. V gody bespokoynogo solntsa. Proza. Stat'i o khudozhnike. Kritika, vospominaniya, pis'ma (pp. 202–208). Vsemirnoе slovo. [In Rus.]

19. Shakirova, L. (2014). U nikh byla velikaya epokha [= And They Enjoyed a Great Era]. In Aleksandr Samokhvalov. 1894–1971 (pp. 5–15). Palace Editions. [In Rus.]

20. Strugatskiy, N. (1933). Aleksandr Samokhvalov. Ogiz Izogiz. [In Rus.]

21. Cahn, I. (1995). Edgar Degas. Gold or Colour. In In Perfect Harmony. Picture + Frame. 1850–1920 (pp. 129–138). University of Washington Press.

22. Mendgen, E. (1995). Art or Decoration. Picture and Frame in the Work of Stuck and Klimt. In In Perfect Harmony. Picture + Frame. 1850–1920 (pp. 97–126). University of Washington Press.

23. Mendgen, E. (1995). James McNeill Whistler. “…carrying on the particular harmony throughout…” In In Perfect Harmony. Picture + Frame. 1850–1920 (pp. 87–94). University of Washington Press.

24. Mitchell, P. & Roderts, L. (1996). Frameworks. Form, Function and Ornament in European Portrait Frames. Merrell Holberton Publ.