

On Illustrating Dostoevsky’s Works
https://doi.org/10.51236/2618-7140-2023-6-3-36-49
Abstract
The article addresses several problematic aspects related to the illustration of F. M. Dostoevsky's literary works. Illustration in particular is one of the major ways to create an “artistic aura” surrounding a literary text. Owing to the visual interpretation of verbal imagery, a new associative layer and a possibility of reinterpretations of the text are able to emerge. The author argues that illustrating novels of one of the greatest Russian writers is a task of special complexity. First of all, this is due to the fact that Dostoevsky's literary portrait is based on different principles than his own. It is primarily linked to the fact that Dostoevsky's literary portrait is based on principles that differ from those of his contemporaries, such as Turgenev, Goncharov, and Tolstoy. External descriptiveness and detailed portrayal of the character retreat in the texts of Dostoevsky before the “energy of contradictions” inherent in the initial portrait of his heroes. As a result, the task of an artist illustrating novels by the Russian literary genius proves arduous: he must convey, first and foremost, the dynamics of personality formation of Raskolnikov, Myshkin, or Dmitri Karamazov, rather than stable recognizability and their physiological individuality. This perspective is applied in order to analyze the work of a variety of prominent illustrators in the light of Dostoevsky's ideas and anthropology. The author of the present study reveals the discrepancies between the writer's world and the embodiment of the characters' images in the illustration. Likewise, he identifies the ways in which, from his point of view, the most striking matches between verbal and visual images appear possible.
Keywords
About the Author
E. V. StepanianRussian Federation
Stepanian Elena Vladimirovna, Ph.D. in Philology Senior Researcher, Scientific and Methodological Department
15 Ul. Akademika Vargi, Moscow 117133
References
1. Adorno, T. W. (2001). Esteticheskaya teoriya [= Ӓsthetische Theorie] (A. V. Dranov, Trans.). Respublika. [In Rus.]
2. Allakhverdov, V. M. (2001). Psikhologiya iskusstva. Esse o tayne emotsional'nogo vozdeystviya khudozhestvennykh proizvedeniy [= Psychology of Art. Essay on the Mystery of the Emotional Impact of Works of Fiction]. DNK. [In Rus.]
3. Antsiferov, N. P. (1923). Peterburg Dostoevskogo. Risunki M. V. Dobuzhinskogo [= Dostoevsky's St. Petersburg. Drawings by M. V. Dobuzhinsky]. Izdatel'stvo Brokgauz-Efron. [In Rus.]
4. Benjamin, W. (1996). Proizvedenie iskusstva v epokhu ego tekhnicheskoy vosproizvodimosti [= Das Kunstwerk im Zeitalter seiner technischen Reproduzierbarkeit]. Izbrannye esse. Medium. [In Rus.]
5. Borisova, V. V. (2023). Illyustratsii M. Shemyakina k romanu F. M. Dostoevskogo “Prestuplenie i nakazanie” v vospriyatii sovremennykh studentov [= Mikhail Shemyakin’s Illustrations of Dostoevsky’s Novel “Crime and Punishment” in the Perception of Contemporary Students]. Dostoevskiy i mirovaya kul'tura. Filologicheskiy zhurnal, 3 (23), 114−128. [In Rus.]
6. Dostoevskiy, F. M. (1972−1990). Polnoe sobranie sochineniy v 30 tt. [= Complete Works: in 30 vols.] Nauka. [In Rus.]
7. Fokin, P. E. (2021). Mir Dostoevskogo glazami Mikhaila Shemyakina [= The World of Dostoevsky Through the Eyes of Mikhail Shemyakin]. Literaturnye znakomstva, 11(62), 221–228. [In Rus.]
8. Gerchuk, Yu. Ya. (2016). Osnovy khudozhestvennoy gramoty [= Basics of Artistic Literacy]. Rip-kholding. [In Rus.]
9. Goncharova, N. G. (2005). Dostoevskiy v zerkalakh grafiki i kritiki [= Dostoyevsky in the Mirrors of Graphics and Criticism]. Sovpadenie. [In Rus.]
10. Khudozhestvennaya aura: istoki, vospriyatie, mifologiya [= Artistic Aura: Origins, Perception, Mythology]. (2011). Indrik. [In Rus.]
11. Makovskiy, S. K. (1986). Mstislav Dobuzhinskiy – grafik [= Mstislav Dobuzhinsky – Graphic Artist]. In Na Parnase “Serebryanogo veka”. [In Rus.]
12. Obrazy Dostoevskogo v knizhnoy illyustratsii i stankovoy grafike [= Dostoevsky’s Imagery and Characters in Book Illustration and Easel Graphics]. (2011). Kuznechniy pereulok. [In Rus.]
13. Stepanian, K. A. (2005). “Soznat' i skazat'”. “Realizm v vysshem smysle” kak tvorcheskiy metod F. M. Dostoevskogo [= “To Cognize and to Speak”. “Realism in a Higher Sense” as a Creative Method of F. M. Dostoevsky]. Raritet. [In Rus.]
14. Stepanian-Rumyantseva, E. V. (2020). Literaturniy portret: ot Pushkina k Dostoevskomu [= The Literary Portrait from Pushkin to Dostoevsky]. Dostoevskiy i mirovaya kul'tura. Filologicheskiy zhurnal, 4(12), 86−104. [In Rus.]
15. Stepun, F. A. (1962). Vstrechi [= Meetings]. Tovarishchestvo zarubezhnykh pisateley. [In Rus.]
Review
For citations:
Stepanian E.V. On Illustrating Dostoevsky’s Works. Secreta Artis. 2023;6(3):36-49. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.51236/2618-7140-2023-6-3-36-49